Hemodynamic goals in sepsis and septic shock resuscitation: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with trial sequential analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to verify whether any parameter among those used as the target for haemodynamic optimisation (e.g., mean arterial pressure, central venous oxygen saturation, systolic or diastolic dysfunction, CO2 gap, lactates, right ventricular dysfunction, and PvaCO2/CavO2 ratio) is correlated with mortality in an undifferentiated population with sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: An umbrella review, searching MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Technology Assessment Database, and the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, was performed. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses enrolling a population of unselected patients with sepsis or septic shock. The main outcome was mortality. Two authors conducted data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments independently. We used a random-effects model to pool binary and continuous data and summarised estimates of effect using equivalent odds ratios (eORs). We used the ROBIS tool to assess risk of bias and the assessment of multiple systematic reviews 2 score to assess global quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: 17 systematic reviews and meta-analyses (15 828 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis. Diastolic dysfunction (eOR: 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.76), PvaCO2/CavO2 ratio (eOR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.37-3.37), and CO2 gap (eOR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.07-3.25) showed a significant correlation with mortality. Lactates were the parameter with highest inconsistency (I2 = 92%). Central venous oxygen saturation and right ventricle dysfunction showed significant statistical excess test of significance (p-value = 0.009 and 0.005, respectively). None of the considered parameters showed statistically significant publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: According to this umbrella review, diastolic dysfunction is the haemodynamic variable that is most closely linked to the prognosis of septic patients. The PvaCO2/CavO2 ratio and the CO2gap are significantly related to the mortality of septic patients, but the poor quality of evidence or the low number of cases, studied so far, limit their clinical applicability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2023, CRD42023432813 (Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023432813).

Development and Validation of the Acute PNeumonia Early Assessment Score for Safely Discharging Low-Risk SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients from the Emergency Department.

A continuous demand for assistance and an overcrowded emergency department (ED) require early and safe discharge of low-risk severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected patients. We developed (n = 128) and validated (n = 330) the acute PNeumonia early assessment (aPNea) score in a tertiary hospital and preliminarily tested the score on an external secondary hospital (n = 97). The score's performance was compared to that of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2). The composite outcome of either death or oral intubation within 30 days from admission occurred in 101 and 28 patients in the two hospitals, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the aPNea model was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.93) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.89) for the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The aPNea score discriminated low-risk patients better than NEWS2 at a 10% outcome probability, corresponding to five cut-off points and one cut-off point, respectively. aPNea's cut-off reduced the number of unnecessary hospitalizations without missing outcomes by 27% (95% CI, 9-41) in the validation cohort. NEWS2 was not significant. In the external cohort, aPNea's cut-off had 93% sensitivity (95% CI, 83-102) and a 94% negative predictive value (95% CI, 87-102). In conclusion, the aPNea score appears to be appropriate for discharging low-risk SARS-CoV-2-infected patients from the ED.

Assessment of Pleural Effusion and Small Pleural Drain Insertion by Resident Doctors in an Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Study.

Small-bore pleural drainage device insertion has become a first-line therapy for the treatment of pleural effusions (PLEFF) in the intensive care unit; however, no data are available regarding the performance of resident doctors in the execution of this procedure. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of complications related to ultrasound-guided percutaneous small-bore pleural drain insertion by resident doctors. In this single-center observational study, the primary outcome was the occurrence of complications. Secondary outcomes studied were as follows: estimation of PLEFF size by ultrasound and postprocedure changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio. In all, 87 pleural drains were inserted in 88 attempts. Of these, 16 were positioned by the senior intensivist following a failed attempt by the resident, giving a total of 71 successful placements performed by residents. In 13 cases (14.8%), difficulties were encountered in advancing the catheter over the guidewire. In 16 cases (18.4%), the drain was positioned by a senior intensivist after a failed attempt by a resident. In 8 cases (9.2%), the final chest X-ray revealed a kink in the catheter. A pneumothorax was identified in 21.8% of cases with a mean size (±SD) of just 10 mm (±6; maximum size: 20 mm). The mean size of PLEFF was 57.4 mm (±19.9), corresponding to 1148 mL (±430) according to Balik's formula. Ultrasound-guided placement of a small-bore pleural drain by resident doctors is a safe procedure, although it is associated with a rather high incidence of irrelevant pneumothoraces.